Wednesday 23 November 2016

IS TARGETING SENIOR CITIZENS A ROLE OF STATE APPARATUS?: Dear All, WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BRUTAL KILLI...




IF YOU ARE BORN OUT OF ONE FATHER THEN AUCTION PROPERTY OR ARREST US IMMEDIATELY


WHY ARE YOU WAITING FOR SON OF BITCH SINHA SINCE 08.09.2011?


SUPREME COURT OF INDIA HAS GIVEN YOU CLEAN-CHIT BASTARD

https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/order-dated-18102017-78384226




IS TARGETING SENIOR CITIZENS A ROLE OF STATE APPARATUS?: Dear All,
 WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BRUTAL KILLI...: Dear All,   WHO IS RESPONSIBLE FOR THE BRUTAL KILLING OF OLD AGE CITIZENS???  RAISE QUESTIONS AND FIND ANSWERS FROM YOUR INSIGHT...

DENIAL OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE BY APEX COURT


REMOVAL OF PRAYER (b) BY SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RESULTED IN DENIAL OF ACCESS TO JUSTICE TO THE PETITIONERS

NOTICE dated 23.03.2017 for removal of Prayer (b) from Withdrawal application AT THIS STAGE, when appeal by way of motion against the Registrar Supreme Court of India has been moved on 20.02.2017 and the same has been kept pending without listing before the Hon’ble Judges since then. Instead, the defective Curative Petition Criminal has been registered on 28.02.2017 forcibly and listed before the Hon’ble Judges-in-Chamber without the consent of petitioners.





Office Report dated 28.04.2017 and subsequent Order dated 01.05.2017 of Supreme Court of India forced the Petitioners to remove Prayer (b) from Withdrawal application which was against the Registrar of Supreme Court of India for suppression of factual records and denial of access to justice to the Petitioners since 03.10.2016.





PARAGRAPH 15 OF CURATIVE PETITION (CRIMINAL) D 41026 OF 2016
ORDER DATED 01.05.2017 PASSED BY SUPREME COURT OF INDIA



REMOVAL OF PRAYER (b) FROM WITHDRAWAL APPLICATION OF CURATIVE PETITION (CRIMINAL)D 41026 OF 2016 ON 05.05.2017









SUPPRESSION OF FACTUAL RECORD BY SUPREME COURT OF INDIA RESULTED IN WRONG JUDICIAL ORDER DATED 27.03.2017 AND IN TURN WRONG JUDICIAL ORDER RESULTED IN PLANNED MURDER OF PETITIONERS

Suppression of letter dated 23.03.2017 of petitioner in Office Report dated 25.03.2017 resulted in Planned Murder/Encounter of Petitioners.

At para 3 and page No. 01 of Office Report dated 25.03.2017 records, “The said defect was communicated to the petitioner –in-person vide this Registry’s letter dated 23.03.2017 as well as by e-mail but he has not cured the defect so far”.








HON’BLE PRESIDENT OF INDIA FORWARDED A COMPLAINT ON 09.03.2017 AGAINST DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FOR ITS REFUSAL TO INTERVENE INTO THE MATTER AS IT IS SUB-JUDICE.
https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/honble-president-of-india-forwarded-complaint-to-department-of-justice-dated-02022017

Hon'ble President of India Transferred a Complaint No. PRSEC/E/2016/16154  against Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha & Praveen Kumar (IDAS) to Ministry of Home Affairs dated 08.03.2017
https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/president-of-india-transferred-complaint-no-prsece201616154-to-ministry-of-home-affairs-dated-08032017
https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/complaint-no-prsece201616154-dated-30122016
First appeal under RTI Act 2005 against Registrar (J-I) Supreme Court of India for REFUSAL OF REGISTRATION OF WRIT CRIMINAL AGAINST UNION OF INDIA D.NO.2188 OF 2017
Aggrieved by the reply of Adl. Registrar & CPIO, Supreme Court of India dated 04.03.2017, appellant preferred First Appeal against CPIO of Supreme Court of India dated 07.03.2017 before Ld. Registrar (Admin) & First Appellate Authority (FAA) Supreme Court of India at New Delhi.

https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/first-appeal-under-rti-act-2005-against-registrar-ji-supreme-court-of-india-for-refusal-of-registration-of-writ-criminal-against-union-of-india-dno2188-of-2017
MATTER BEGINS FROM 2004 WHILE NHRC WRITES 1991
MINDLESS REPLY BY NATIONAL HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION’S DATED 2.12.2016 AGAINST A COMPLAINT OF SENIOR CITIZEN OXYGEN DEPENDENT RURAL AND UNEDUCATED WIDOW WOMAN
https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/national-human-rights-commissions-reply-dated-2122016

TRUTH MUST PREVAIL........ PIL ADMITTED BY SC
https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/action-taken-by-honble-supreme-court-of-india
https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/honble-president-house-report-17012017 https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/doj-to-secy-gen-sci-17012017 https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/complaint-enclosure-17012017
Application for defending Human Rights before Hon'ble Supreme Court of India vide D.NO. 19917 dated 03.03.2017
Crl. M.P. NO.......of 2017 Vide D.NO. 19917 dated 03.03.2017 against Curative Petition (Criminal) D 41026 of 2016
https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/crl-mp-noof-2017-vide-dno-19917-dated-03032017-against-curative-petition-criminal-d-41026-of-2016
Objection Letter to Registrar Supreme Court of India for Spoiling the Genuine Relief of the Petitioners dated 2nd march 2017 Reply against NOTICE of Hearing for 27.03.2017 dated 01.03.2017 issued by Section X Supreme Court of India and prayer for withdrawal/correction of forcible NOTICE dated 01.03.2017 and issuance of NOTICE for appearance against D.NO. 16166 of 2017 and D.NO. 17593 of 2017 for urgent relief-reg. https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/objection-letter-to-registrar-sci-for-spoiling-the-genuine-relief-of-the-petitioners-dated-2nd-march-2017 https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/writ-criminlal-noof-2017-titled-om-prakash-anr-vs-union-of-india-ors-filed-on-1812017-vide-diary-no-2188-before-supreme-court-of-india-with-276-pages

 FORCIBLE NOTICE OF HEARING DATED 01.03.2017 FOR CURATIVE WHILE APPEAL AGAINST LODGEMENT ORDER DATED 16.02.2017 HAS BEEN MOVED
https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/notice-of-hearing-curative-petition-criminal-d-41026-of-2016 https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/appeal-against-lodgment-order-of-registrar-sci-under-order-xv-rule-5-of-sci-rules-2013 https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/press-information-unic-new-delhi-dated-01032017
Aggrieved by the reply of Registrar (Admin) & FAA, Supreme Court of India dated 23.02.2017, appellant preferred Second Appeal against Registrar of Supreme Court of India D.No. 113204 dated 27.02.2017 before CIC of New Delhi. https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/second-appeal-against-registrar-of-supreme-court-of-india-dno-113204-dated-27022017
Listing Performa dated 23.02.2017 D.NO. 17593 of 2017 against Criminal Appeal against Denial of access to Justice by the Registrar Supreme Court of India
https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/application-for-listing-performa-against-appeal-against-denial-of-access-to-justice-by-registrar-supreme-court-of-india-dated-23022017-dno-17593-of-2017

Reply by First Appellate Authority (FAA), Supreme Court of India dated 06.06.2017 against Suppression of factual record in office report dated 25.03.2017 in Curative Petition (Criminal)D 41026 of 2016





Reply by First Appellate Authority (FAA), Supreme Court of India dated 04.04.2017 against refusal of registration of Writ Petition (Criminal) D.NO.2188 of 2017 entitled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS"






Reply by Registrar Admin & FAA , Supreme Court of India dated 23.02.2017 against Violation of set practice, procedure and rules by the Registrar of this Hon'ble Court as laid down in the Handbook of this Hon'ble Court

RTI reply by Additional Registrar & CPIO , Supreme Court of India dated 04.02.2017 against Violation of set practice, procedure and rules by the Registrar of this Hon'ble Court as laid down in the Handbook of this Hon'ble Court



RTI request dated 05.01.2017

BRUTALITY BY JUDGES AGAINST A COMMON MAN & WOMAN

WITHOUT ACTUAL RESPONDENT/OPPOSITE PARTY (13 YEARS LONG MATTER) https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/brutality-by-higher-courts-judges-against-a-common-man-without-actual-respondentopposite-party-since-2012

APPEAL BY WAY OF MOTION AGAINST THE LODGEMENT ORDER DATED 16.02.2017 VIDE D.NO.3913 OF 2017 ISSUED BY REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA UNDER ORDER XV RULE 5 OF THE SUPREME COURT RULES, 2013.

Denial of access to Justice to a Common Man & Woman by Supreme Court of India
Writ Criminal against Registrar of Supreme Court of India for refusal to register Writ Criminal against Union of India under Article 32 of Constitution of India
http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/writ-petition-criminal-noof-2017-vide-dno3913-against-registrar-supreme-court-of-india-for-lodgement-of-writ-criminal-dno2188-of-2017

LODGEMEMENT ORDER DATED 28.01.2017 BY REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA




LODGEMEMENT ORDER DATED 16.02.2017 BY REGISTRAR SUPREME COURT OF INDIA




First Appeal against CIC dated 27.01.2017 for Non-Implementation of Sec 7(1) of RTI Act 2005

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/rti-online-first-appeal-against-cic-for-nonimplementation-of-section-71-of-rti-act-2005

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/first-appeal-against-cic-new-delhi-dated-24012017-for-non-implementation-of-section-71-of-rti-act-2005

                         LAST RESORT.......LAST RESORT.......LAST RESORT..........

Writ Criminlal No..........of 2017 titled "OM PRAKASH & ANR VS. UNION OF INDIA & ORS" filed on 18.1.2017 Vide Diary No. 2188 against Supreme Court of India for Evading Rule of Law; Violating set practice, procedure as laid down in the Handbook of this Hon'ble Court; protecting/shielding Bad Elements of State Apparatus and offending, harassing, victimizing the Petitioner-in Person and his Senior Citizen old age Oxygen dependent mother.
This happens to be last resort under legal remedy before the COURT OF LAW.

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/writ-criminlal-noof-2017-titled-om-prakash-anr-vs-union-of-india-ors-filed-on-1812017-vide-diary-no-2188-before-supreme-court-of-india-with-276-pages

RTI against CIC New Delhi dated 5.1.2017 for Non-Implementation of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005 

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/rti-request-against-cic-dated-512017

RTI against Supreme Court of India dated 05.01.2017 for protecting and shielding BAD ELEMENTS OF STATE APPARATUS and harassing, offending, victimizing Common man and Woman

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/rti-against-supreme-court-of-india-dated-05012017

Reply of First Appellate Authority CIC New Delhi against Non-Implementation of Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005

https://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/reply-by-first-appellate-authority-cic-new-delhi-against-nonimplementation-of-section-71-of-rti-act-2005-dated-30-january-2017

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/first-appeal-against-cic-new-delhi-dated-24012017-for-non-implementation-of-section-71-of-rti-act-2005

Supreme Court of India closes its door to punish BAD ELEMENT OF STATE APPARATUS 

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/defects-notification-letter-issued-by-section-x-of-supreme-court-of-india-dated-512017

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/defects-cure-letter-to-the-registrar-misc-section-x-of-sci-dated-06012017

Nexus of Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha & Praveen Kumar (IDAS) to kill me and my oxygen dependent mother in the defense area of Palam New Delhi and to usurp our property in Bihar has been apprised to Controller General Defense Accounts (CGDA), Government of India to take departmental action against Praveen Kumar (IDAS)

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/nexus-of-rtd-justice-sb-sinha-and-praveen-kumar-idas-to-cgda

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/communication-with-controller-general-defense-accounts-dated-28122016 

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/pmo-complaint-to-controller-general-defense-accounts-pmopge20160599866-dated-27122016 

Evidence against Nexus of Rtd Justice S.B. Sinha & Praveen Kumar (IDAS) to kill us

Nexus of Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha and Praveen Kumar (IDAS) involved into this 12 years long matter to kill me and my Oxygen dependent mother in the defense area of Palam New Delhi and to usurp our property in Bihar has been apprised to the Hon’ble Supreme Court of India through SLP(C) no. 9854/2012, SLP(C) no. 9483/2013, SLP(C) no. 19073/2013, Writ (C) 90 of 2016, Writ (Crl.) 136 of 2016, Review (Crl.) 825 of 2016 and Curative (Crl.) vide diary no. 41026; Hon’ble prime Minister of India through PMOPG/E/2016/0599866 dated 22.12.2016; Hon’ble President of India through PRSEC/E/2016/16154 dated 30.12.2016 and Controller General Defense Accounts (CGDA), Government of India through email dated 28.12.2016 to take appropriate action against Rtd. Justice S.B. Sinha and Praveen Kumar (IDAS). THAT THE EVIDENCES OF NEXUS OF RTD JUSTICE S.B. SINHA AND PRAVEEN KUMAR (IDAS) HAVE BEEN ENCLOSED AS LINK WITH THIS POST IN 13 PAGES AND 29 PARA ONLY http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/communication-with-secretary-general-of-supreme-court-of-india-dated-31122016-70597654

 http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/evidence-of-nexus-of-rtd-justice-sb-sinha-and-praveen-kumar-idas-to-secretary-general-of-supreme-court-of-india-by-om-prakash-dated-31122016


CIC Maintains Silence to Invoke Section 7(1) of RTI Act 2005


Hon’ble Prime Minister of India,

CIC fails to give decision on the request to invoke section 7(1) of RTI Act made by the applicant on 30.11.2016, although the imminent danger has been demonstrably proven by the applicant.

Section 7 in the Right to Information Act, 2005 says,

(2) If the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be fails to give decision on the request for information within the period specified under sub‑section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be shall be deemed to have refused the request.

(8) Where a request has been rejected under sub‑section (1), the Central Public Information Officer or State Public Information Officer, as the case may be shall communicate to the person making the request,—

(i) the reasons for such rejection;

(ii) the period within which an appeal against such rejection may be preferred; and

(iii) the particulars of the appellate authority.

(9) An information shall ordinarily be provided in the form in which it is sought unless it would disproportionately divert the resources of the public authority or would be detrimental to the safety or preservation of the record in question.

CIC has passed the following observation about section 7(1) in N.N. Kalia Vs University of Delhi on 3rd September 2009, "The life and liberty provision can be applied only in cases where there is an imminent danger to the life and liberty of a person and the non-supply of the information may either lead to death or grievous injury to the concerned person. Liberty of a person is threatened if she or he is going to be incarcerated or has already been incarcerated and the disclosure of the information may change that situation. If the disclosure of the information would obviate the danger then it may be considered under the proviso of Section 7(1). The imminent danger has to be demonstrably proven". 

Hence, this case is fit to invoke section 7(1) by CIC. However, CIC maintains silence on applicant’s application.

NOW WHERE TO GO? WHAT TO DO? EXCEPT SURVIVE AT THE MERCY OF GOD OR ELSE FINISH LIFE SILENTLY.
KINDLY INTERVENE INTO THE MATTER AND DO THE NEEDFUL.


PLEASE FIND ENCLOSED THE APPLCATION UNDERR SECTION 7(1) OF RTI ACT MADE BY THE APPLICANT TO CIC

http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/cic-maintains-silence-to-invoke-section-71-of-rti-act-2005

CIC Says, "No Provisions of Life and Liberty under RTI Act 2005”.


Two replies of DS(CR) CIC dated 02.12.2016 & dated 28.12.2016 are contradictory to each other. Can CIC afford to say "No Provisions of Life and Liberty under RTI Act 2005”?

Below is Reply of DS(CR) CIC New Delhi dated 02.12.2016 & 28.12.2016

 http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/communication-with-ds-cr-of-cic-wef-30112016-to-28122016


 Certified Copy of Office Report dated 20.10.2016 disclosed Well designed Criminal Conspiracy by Registrar Section X of Supreme Court of India

 http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/certified-copy-of-office-report-dated-20102016-in-writ-petition-criminal-136-of-2016-issued-by-registrar-section-x-of-sc

A well-designed criminal conspiracy being commissioned and strategy being adopted against the petitioner by the Quasi-Judicial Officer of this Hon’ble Court to spoil the valid ground of the case and make it liable to be dismissal with liberty by this Hon’ble Court and to close the door of the Hon’ble Apex Court under Article 32 for enforcement of guaranteed fundamental right of the petitioner under Article 21
Certified copy of the office report dated 20.10.2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 issued by Registrar Section X of Supreme Court of India has disclosed that Registry has not surrender the file before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court. It has been disclosed that Registry has suppressed the record of application dated 03.10.2016 for urgent mentioning of the matter and urgent relief sought before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India filed by the petitioner on behalf of petitioner no.02 as per the guidelines and grounds laid down in the Handbook of this Hon’ble Court.
Further it has also been disclosed through Office report that the Registry has circulated UNREGISTERED Interlocutory Application for constitution bench dated 18.10.2016 vide diary no. 77878 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016 to spoil the ground of constitution bench and to make it liable to be dismissed by two judge bench to push the petitioner into the Curative stage intentionally to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of Certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016.
FIND ATTACHED CERTIFIED COPY OF OFFICE REPORT DATED 20.10.2016 IN WRIT PETITION CRIMINAL 136 OF 2016 ISSUED BY THE REGISTRAR SECTION X OF SUPREME COURT OF INDIA.





DOES THIS CASE NEED CERTIFICATE BY SR. ADVOCATE TO CURE GROSS MISCARRIAGE OF JUSTICE?http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/curative-petition-criminal-before-supreme-court-of-india-filed-on-09122016-vide-diary-no-41026
http://www.slideshare.net/OmPrakashPoddar/curative-petition-criminal-registered-before-sc

CURATIVE PETITION CRIMINAL WITHOUT CERTIFICATE BY Sr. ADVOCATE violating Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs Ashok Hurra ; valid reason at para 15 of the petition
Curative petition criminal before supreme court of India has been filed on 09.12.2016 vide diary no. 41026 WITHOUT certificate by Sr. Advocate violating the the guidelines laid down in Rupa Ashok Hurra Vs Ashok Hurra 2002 (4) SCC 388. It is further submitted under para 15 of the Curative Petition Criminal that the Certificate by Sr. Advocate has not been filed by the petitioner because of the valid and unavoidable reasons which has been caused by this Hon’ble Court. The petitioner has been pushed into the Curative stage intentionally by this Hon’ble Court to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. The mentioning officer of this Hon’ble Court has stopped the petitioner no.02 who was eligible to mention the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s court and Registry has circulated unregistered Interlocutory Application for constitution bench dated 18.10.2016 vide diary no. 77878 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. Further Registry has suppressed the record of application dated 03.10.2016 for urgent mentioning of the matter and urgent relief sought before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India filed by the petitioner on behalf of petitioner no.02 as per the guidelines and grounds laid down in the Handbook of this Hon’ble Court. Registry did not surrender the file before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court which has been disclosed through certified copy of the office report dated 20.10.2016 in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016. Hence, Mentioning Officer and Registry both have spoiled the valid ground of Constitution bench and mentioning the matter before Hon’ble the Chief Justice of India’s Court to make it liable to be dismissed with liberty by the two judge bench violating the Order XXXV of Supreme Court Rule 1966. In other words, petitioner has been pushed into the Curative stage intentionally by this Hon’ble Court to close the door of this Hon’ble Court for the petitioner no.01 and 02 in the garb of certificate by Sr. Advocate, as the petitioner had refused to engage any legal Aid Advocate against this matter in Writ Petition Criminal 136 of 2016; which has resulted in gross miscarriage of justice. In view of the above mentioned circumstances, Petitioner no. 01 and 02 has been left with no option but to survive or may not survive at the mercy of the GOD. 

Posted by at

No comments:

Post a Comment

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)